Monday, August 27, 2007

Normal

(also available in Dutch)

I remember lying in my bed. I was young, five or six years old. The sun came in through the windows, you could hear the gentle whisper of the wind in the giant poplars across the street. A balmy spring wind, it told you. Cool, with the scent of morning. I listen to the sounds of the world behind my window. The coo-ing of the doves on the roof. The peacock in the petting zoo. And far off, ships traveled the river Waal; the low thumping of their engines calm and reassuring. From behind the tree the town church rings its bells. It was a sunday, I knew. In the garden of our neighbors the appletrees blossomed. A cloud of light pink petals covered our gardens.

That is how I remember the sunday mornings of my childhood. Calm and beautiful, saturated in a slow light. Going into town with my father for a cup of coffee in 'De Gouden Leeuw', The Gold Lion. I got a lemonade and knibbled on the coffee cookie my father left for me. I looked outside: on the steps of the church Rieske greeted churchgoers loudly and exhuberantly. Rieske was a boy with Downs syndrome, or, like we called 'm, a Garenvelder. The Garenveld was a sprawling care facility for the mentally handicapped; a phenomenon in the wide surroundings. Their patients, the Garenvelders, decorated the streets. You'd usually see them walking around in small groups; one supervisor with three to five jovially drooling protegés. The 'better' cases, like Rieske, were allowed to wander the town unsupervised.

The towns inhabitants had welcomed the Garenvelders into their hearts; no criticism about them was accepted. People from outside, who dared to joke about 'retards' when seeing Garenvelders, were sternly told off. Our Garenvelders were people too, and even if they were somewhate eccentric in their behavior, and even if they looked kind of strange, they were very easy to live with. The towns inhabitants felt deeply responsible for the welfare and wellbeing of the Garenvelders. At the bakery all customers helped with reading the shoppinglist of a Garenvelder, or with counting the change, and there was always someone to explain to a Garenvelder in which slot of the mailbox a letter could best be posted. And sometimes, when the behavior of a Garenvelder threatened to become too eccentric, the towns inhabitants did not hesitate to intervene: 'Hey Rieske, behave yourself! You call that normal?'

That was less then 20 years ago. But who still knows what is normal? When I walk into my town now, the inevitable conclusion forces itself upon me: The Netherlands is gone and will never come back. The Garenveld, together with the petting zoo and the Garenvelders, disappeared from the town. "Cost-saving decentralisation" it is called. The freed land has been filled to the brim with cheap appartment blocks, predominantly occupied by allochtones; their satellite dishes aimed at a wavelenght they apparently can't find in their host nation. The new suburbs in the west of town, built when I was a kid and at the time fresh and sunny looking, have become depressing and grey. Houses lack upkeep, the paint on window frames flaking and gone, the vandalized busstops not being replaced anymore. Groups of youth hang out with their scooters and spit automaton-like on the ground; the shade of their caps hiding an angry and distrustful expression. Veiled in gray, bent women hurriedly walk by, as if they are running from something, or have to be in before curfew. Is that normal?

One of the bars in town is now managed by what the locals call the 'Turkish Maffia'. Autochtones are not welcome there, except to buy stolen goods or drugs. During the European Championship Football in 2004 a small incident got completely out of hand; an autochtone townsman got into an argument in the Turkish bar and had to flee into the Gouden Leeuw. His attackers were stopped at the door and turned away, only to return with reinforcements. Eventually the riot police had to be called in to clean out the towns centre. The Gouden Leeuw, the café where I used to drink coffee with my father, was treated to a molotov cocktail a couple of days later. Is that normal? And: none of these incidents ever made it to TV news or even the papers --- how normal is that? Because of these incidents the town closed up definitively; the last remains of the old spirit have disappeared. People have become closed, cautious, frightened.

There is a force active in the Netherlands, that lives on this fear; a force that savours tearing apart the textures of traditional society. It is the force of the progressives: it hates contentment, it hates the citizen that dares to be statisfied with his life, it hates the soap bubble of safety that the common man wishes for himself, it hates the tranquility that the status quo gives to the citizenry. This force has always bothered the citizen with so-called progressiveness. Women's Lib, gay marriage, long hairs, legal weed, etc., etc. Ofcourse I have nothing against feminism or gay marriages, but I distrust the motives of the progressivos that all of a sudden feel the urgent need to defend gays or women. These people are not *really* interested in the elevation of humanity, they are only interested in Schadenfreude. Time and again they have laughed at the stupid, frightened bourgois asshole who was forced to tear down yet another one of his sacrosanct views and make sense of something he did not know, did not understand. The desparate fear of the average citizen is the food and drink of the progressive. Self-satisfied he can conclude that he is capable of embracing a world view that is frightening to the average citizen.

Look, you bourgois asshole! See our world, and look at your small, petty bourgois asshole existence. Our world is greater and deeper then yours; our world knows suffering, our world knows hunger and death and violence. Our world knows grand ideals. Our world understands criminals and pedophiles, our world understands terrorists, our world understands everything. That is why we are superior to you and to prove it, we will force our world upon you and we will feed on your fear, and we will laugh as you go down screaming. Because how do you *dare* think you can be content with yourself? Everytime you think you have neared us, we will widen the chasm further. Everything we can find, we will smear in your face; all your certainties we will undermine, everything that makes you feel safe, we will contaminate. Your arch enemies we will welcome cheeringly and house them under your noses. Everything we will take away and we will make sure there is nowhere left for you to turn. If you protest, we will insult and belittle you. If you resist, we will sentence you. We will manipulate you and lie to you untill you have no thought other then the fiery wish to be absolved of your guilt and affectionately seal your own definitive downfall. We will transform your world into a hell; that serves a higher purpose, although we don't have a clue what that purpose actually is.

The progressives have done their destructive work well; with islam as a crowbar they have broken the spirit of the Netherlands for good and are tearing down the last of the traditional structures. Housing, labour, education, manners; nothing is what it used to be. Nothing is natural or obvious anymore, everything has become guilt-ridden and corroded. Who knows what is normal anymore? Who knows anymore what behavior may be expected, or even demanded, from fellow citizens? The average citizen, who time after time tried his or her hardest to adapt, is completely lost. All that he knew has been taken away, all the ways he could arm himself have become powerless. We are made to walk as if on eggs through our own society, yelled at by the propagandists of the progressive congregation, who tell us it is all our own fault.

But there is nothing to reproach. From the way the Garenvelders were included in the town community a lesson can be learned: Citizens are accomodating, there is a lot they can get used to. The Dutch were heartily willing to also get used to their new compatriots. I don't see what more a populations should be prepared to do; in our willingness to adapt we have gone much further then reasonably could be expected from any group of people. Oh, how intensely I hope that this realisation one day sets in, that in the head of my fellow citizens the light rekindles! Surely I can't be the only one that aches for the Netherlands of my memories? How I hope that the (Danish) cartoon brouhaha, that has promptly been used by the PC gestapo to question the freedom of the press, finally makes clear to the Dutch that they've been manoeuvered into a position that is not normal; a position they must not accept. Because you should not enter into a discussion with retards that think that their Allah is more important then your sense of humor; such retards should simply be admonished: 'Hey muslims, behave yourselves! You call that normal?'

(translation provided by kleinverzet.blogspot.com)

11 reacties:

Tony said...

Excellent translation, although "satellite discs" should really be "satellite dishes".

The article itself is great of course, but it already was in Dutch so no change there.

central_pole said...

Great article (when it comes to style) but really depressing in it's point, and to be honest, I think it will end up with something that we already saw in ex-yugoslavia :(

Hal K said...

It could be said that progressives are afflicted with "winner’s complex," a term used by Gorbachev to describe the United States after the Cold War. The progressives were right in the past about many things, but now they are going too far, while continuing to crave the feeling of moral superiority and triumph.

Of course, their immediate response to a challenge such as what you wrote is to make the "slippery slope" argument and accuse their opponents of wanting to go back to the bad old days when they were right. This is especially the case in the U.S. where many people can still remember legal segregation.

By the way, the comparisons of Islamists to "retards" is a bit problematic, and I would expect that if your essay became widely read that many would seize upon this to call your broader message into question.

Lagonda said...

I'm not sure I agree with the "winner's complex"-theory . To me, the main goal of the progressives was, is, and always will be to bother the "bourgeois" society. If this attitude has led to beneficial effects in the past, like emancipation and gay rights, that's great, but it doesn't mean they where "winners" --- they were just right for the wrong reasons. Their past results didn't make them feel morally superior; they have always felt morally superior. More essays on the progressive mindset will follow.

Furthermore, I'm not comparing Islamists to retards (even though, let's face it, some Islamists DO behave like retards). I was actually making the point that regular civilians are perfectly willing and able to adapt their behaviour to a group of people that have trouble fitting in --- even a group as bothersome as people with Down's syndrome. And even though muslims are not retards, they do have trouble fitting in, and also exists at the fringes of society. They have trouble expressing themselves, they have trouble understanding Dutch. They have trouble finding their way around society, and every day they are confronted with a thousand things they don't understand.

Dutch civilians are always accused by politicians that they haven't done enough to accomodate immigrants --- I'm trying to make the point here that there is in fact a lot civilians are willing (and have been willing) to accomodate, and that there's a reasonable limit to this willingness. This limit has been completely and purposefully disregarded and violated by the progressive thinkers that have shaped our society. In case of trying to accomodate muslim people that had trouble fitting in, the Dutch civilians were tied with their hands behind their backs, because we were not allowed to say certain things, express certain doubts, criticize certain thoughts or correct certain behaviour.

Anonymous said...

This is a great post. It really encapusulates every i despise about 'progressives' and reminded me of something i saw on tv in the UK about a year ago.

Kirsty Wark is the presenter of the BBC news programme 'Newsnight'. The BBC on the whole is quite liberal/progressive and Kirsy Wark is a prime example of the sanctimonious self-righteous lefty. Anyway, she made a series of programmes in which she travelled around the new entrant countries to the EU. In Slovenia she found an idyllic society where young people could afford to buy homes and enjoy their beautiful country. But Kirsty - with her eyes shining brightly with a greater wisdom asked the young women she was speaking to: How was Slovenia going to deal with Immigration, Diversity and Multiculturalism. Kirsty, and the UK, are obviously at the vanguard of these wonderful developments and the gospel must be spread.

You see, Kirsty represents the media elite in the UK and she has personally benefited from the fact that many English people feel like strangers in their own country. And this must be the enlightened, virtuous destination of Slovenia and all European peoples. The native 'bourgeois' European who goes to work, looks after their family and has no interest in trangressive art must become a minority and shall enjoy no peace or community.

Lagonda said...

Hehehe, yep! That's exactly what's going on.

You'll probably like my previous piece also:
Shawarma!

Stay tuned! More pieces on the mindset of the progressives will follow.

Mary said...

I can relate greatly to this post as I have seen my own homeland, California, basically destroyed by "diversity" and "multiculturalism." When I was small (35-40 years ago) we had a quite spectacular culture -- it really was a paradise. The culture was resolutely what is now called "Anglo" -- in those days it was just American. We had a high degree of income equality, we had the best public education system in the US, the best infrastructure, the lowest crime, the best of everything. A simple, uneducated working class man like my father could support a family of nine -- yes nine! -- on one small income. We were the envy of much of the world -- the world that was enchanted by blonde surfers, Beach Boys music, Hollywood premiers, margaritas around the pool -- carefree and casual lifestyle in the sun.

Then came mass immigration from less successful cultures, and the great "benefits" of "diversity", meaning mostly that we couldn't ever speak up about what was happening in our communities or else we were "racist." Town after town changed radically, almost overnight -- from English speaking to Spanish speaking, in the blink of an eye. (How could this be "diversity" if all the towns were changing over to the same dominant culture? The "progressives" never explained this contradiction, just like they never explain any of their ideological contradictions, ever.)Many parts of my once-great homeland now look like a Third World country. The educational system is bottom of the class, the once-gleaming infrastructure is falling apart, the gap between rich and poor is astronomical, our children can't play outside unsupervised until 9 o'clock in the evening, as I once did, because it's not safe, even in the richest neighborhoods -- in short all the positives I knew from my childhood are gone. If you are rich or at least affluent you can still afford to live in "Anglo" America here but that is certainly not attainable by the average Jane or Joe American. They either must live with the chaotic Third Worlders -- or flee to other states. Most of them just flee. I too am the resident of a ruined homeland.

Mark Richardson said...

Lagonda, thanks for making these articles available in English.

I've referred to your thoughts on the situation in Holland here.

Anonymous said...

I largely agree with the comments made in this thread, but I'd argue that the negative changes in many Western societies are not entirely due to immigration.

Take my mid-sized Canadian city. Twenty years ago it was all white (with a few Natives); it's still basically all white (with a few natives and a few professional-class Chinese and Indians). But the negative changes are apparent: some areas are a bit scary; children can't go around the neighbourhood by themselves; you have to survey a park for undesirables before you let your children play there.

The causes? Drugs and the welfare class, as far as I can tell.

But your story about the Garenvelders reminds me of something else. In the neighbourhood I used to live in there was middle-aged mentally retarded fellow who hung around the shops and the little cafe and chat with whoever had the patience for him. The people generally looked out for him: the girls at the cafe would give him coffee - but no more than one cup of caffeinated coffee a day: "You know how excited you get, John, when you get too much caffeine." And they didn't let him beg: "John, you mustn't ask people for money."

Ten or twelve years later, the neighbourhood has changed; it's gone upscale. The little cafe was driven out of business by Starbucks and its groovy competitor across the street; the old watch shop and fish-and-chip have gone, replaced by condos; the unfashionable restaurant has been replaced by a trendy organic grocery store. John is still there, but nobody takes him in hand, and he begs all the time.

It's a cultural change. The new people who set the tone of the neighbourhood probably think more highly of themselves than their unassuming predecessors, but they're not better people at all.

Lagonda said...

@mark: Thank you for your elaborate article. It is nice to experience how blogging is taken much more seriously in the english-speaking world than it is in Holland. I will pen a response when I have the time.

@anonymous: Well, I'm not blaming immigration per se --- I'm actually blaming our own mentality and choices in response to immigration. There are a thousand things we should have done with our new fellow citizens, education being chief among these, but somehow we deluded ourselves into thinking that we could simultaneously a) avoid having to painfully confront the newcomers with their shortcomings, and b) become a morally superior person for not seeking this confrontation. We thought it was a win-win scenario. And, well, it wasn't.

Lagonda said...

By the way: the phenomena you describe all have to do with the progressive tendency to avoid confronting people with their own behaviour --- all in the name of so-called liberty.

Before you start liberating people, you better make sure they understand the manual.